Legal Opinion

Times Herald Printing Co. v. A.H. Belo Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1991No. A14-90-00856-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANNON, Justice.

The principal question posed by this appeal is whether anticompetitive conduct of a defendant who attempts to achieve monopoly power in a relevant market may be redeemed by a legitimate business purpose. When that conduct involves a nonprice vertical restraint, the answer is no. Rather, the proper approach is to apply a “rule of reason” standard, allowing the trier of facts to weigh all of the evidence to determine whether the legitimate business justifications of a defendant’s conduct outweigh its threat to competition or whether the conduct unreasonably restrained…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. Fuqua, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Banc One Capital Partners Corp. v. KneipperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Knox v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. United States Sporting Products, Inc. v. Johnny Stewart Game Calls, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API