Legal Opinion
Kessen v. Bernhardt
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 3, 1958No. Civ. Nos. 5816, 5817PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
The above actions were commenced by plaintiffs to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiffs were passengers in an automobile owned and operated by defendant Henry G. Schwer, which collided with an automobile owned and operated by defendant Emil Bernhardt. The ac*653tions were consolidated for trial before the Court and a jury. Each of the plaintiffs had a verdict against both defendants. Defendant Schwer by a blended motion seeks to have the judgment vacated and verdict set aside and for judgment or a new trial in his favor. Defendant Bernhardt moves to have the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Swanson v. J. L. Shiely Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Crouch v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Giles v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Kauppi v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fabrizi v. GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Virginian Railway Company, a Corporation v. James Ernest Rose, an Infant, by Ernest Rose, His Next Friend, and Ernest Rose and Janice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Jamison v. Di Nardo, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Blackburn v. Aetna Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Tsai v. RosenthalDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.