Legal Opinion
Tsai v. Rosenthal
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 30, 1960No. Civ. No. 4-60-222PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
A discussion of the evidence in this three-car collision case is uncalled for except to say that it is conceded by all defendants that plaintiff passenger was free from negligence. The jury found defendants Rosenthal and movant negligent. A verdict for plaintiff is justified by the evidence and would not be disturbed if liability and damages had been properly allocated.
Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., confers ample power upon the trial court to prevent injustice. The means of accomplishing a just result following verdict and judgment is not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Frank Altrichter v. Shell Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Kessen v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson Tsai v. Anne C. Rosenthal and Mound Motors, Inc., Anne C. Rosenthal v. Johnson Tsai and Mound Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Curtis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
- Annc C. Rosenthal v. Johnson Tsai & Mound MotorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961