Legal Opinion
Jamison v. Di Nardo, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 12, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 15563PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
This is an action to recover damages under the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death and Survival Statutes (12 P.S. § 1601 et seq., 20 P.S. § 320.601 et seq.) arising out of an accident when decedent was instantly killed as a result of gas asphyxiation.
Verdicts were returned in favor of Howard Jamison, Administrator of the Estate of Julius Colosimo, deceased, and against Di Nardo, Inc., defendant, under the Pennsylvania Survival Statute in the amount of $10,000 and under the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death Statute in the amount of $75,000. Verdict was also returned in favor of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Trowbridge v. Abrasive Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Masterson v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Glazer v. GlazerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
- Brinegar v. San Ore Construction CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1969
- Smith v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Stubler v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965