Legal Opinion
United States v. Camarota
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 6, 1922No. 493PublishedCited by 25 opinions
Criminal prosecution by the United States against Joe Camarota and another. On motion by the defendant named for the return or destruction of certain property taken without a search warrant.
1Opinion of the Court
TRIPPET, District Judge.
The defendant Camarota moves the court in this case to return or to destroy certain property taken by a prohibition officer without a search warrant, and upon his motion he states the facts and the grounds for his motion to be as follows:
“On the 18th day of August, 1921, the federal agent, T. J. Nicely, obtained a search warrant from the United States commissioner at Fresno, California, which search warrant authorized him to search the private premises at 1607 E street, in the city of Fresno, county of Fresno, California, and the property to be searched for named in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
- Ex parte MorrillUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Welchek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Vachina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Paper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Gandreau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- Church v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.