Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. 99-00322; A110337PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

SAIF Corporation seeks reversal of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board concluding that claimant had suffered a compensable injury when an on-the-job accident caused one of her saline breast implants to collapse. SAIF asserts that the Board erred, as a matter of law, in concluding that a compensable injury occurred, because the accident in question caused neither a compensable injury to claimant nor a compensable injury to a prosthetic appliance. In particular, SAIF argues, first, that the record does not support the Board’s finding of an injury to claimant. Second, it argues that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. K-MART v. EvensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Iles v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis GroupCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Richardson v. MAXIM HEALTHCARE/ALLEGISCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis GroupCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API