Legal Opinion

Ramsay & Gatlin Const. Co. v. Vincennes Bridge Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1931No. 5446PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Bridge Company, as plaintiff brought this suit in the court below against the Construction Company and the Guaranty Company. The Bridge Company became the subcontractor in the erection of a hotel, pursuant to a contract between the owner and the Construction Company, and in pursuance of which contract the Construction Company, as principal, and the Guaranty Company, as surety, gave to the owner a bond which provided for, among other things, “payment of all labor and material furnished to the contractor.” The Bridge Company, being unpaid, brought this suit in the court below against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Harrison Granite Co. v. StephensMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. WM. Cameron & Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Orlando Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API