Legal Opinion
Weatherford v. Home Finance Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 31, 1954No. 16873PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
On January 29, 1952, Mack Weatherford, respondent, bought from F. F. Morrison, Jr., at Hartsville, S. C., a used automobile. The purchase price was $830.00. He’ was allowed $275.00 for a trade-in, leaving a balance of $555.00. The terms of the trade having been settled, Weatherford told Morrison that it would be the next day before he could take the car because he had planned to finance the balance through the bank, and it was then after banking hours. At the suggestion of Morrison, the Home Finance Company, in the City of Hartsville, was called on the telephone and the following is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lillie B. Thomas v. the Amer. WorkmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Bowers v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Cook v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Beaudrot v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Smyth v. FleischmannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robertsen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
- Johnson v. LIFE INS. CO. OF GEORGIASupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Felder v. Great American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
- Palmetto Federal Savings Bank v. Industrial Valley Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1991
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.