Legal Opinion
Felder v. Great American Insurance Company
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 16, 1966No. Civ. A. CO-65-26PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings of three causes of action as set forth in the complaint, and, in the event that the motion fail as to less than all causes of action, that the action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in that the required amount will not be involved in the controversy.
It is alleged that Jestine Felder gave a note and a mortgage on her home to Home Federal Savings and Loan in the amount of $1,500.00. Shortly after the loan Herbert and Jestine purchased a health and accident policy from the defendant insurance company through Home…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Metropolitan Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker Distributing Company v. Lucky Lager Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Atlantic & Pacific Railroad v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Brown v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Aspell v. American Contract Bridge League of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Troutman v. Facetglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Duc v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.