United States v. Jean D. Dockery
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
We here decide, consistently with the great weight of authority, that it was not a denial of due process of law for the trial judge in sentencing to rely upon the presentenee investigative report without disclosing its entire contents to appellant. The longstanding and uniform understanding of the requirements of due process makes the contrary argument one “more properly to be made to the Supreme Court,” Castle v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 398, 401, 347 F.2d 492, 495 (1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 929, 85 S.Ct. 1568, 14 L.Ed.2d 687 (1965), and to the rule-making authority.
I
Jean D.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Donald Kilsmuth Hess and Louis Clifton Hess. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Rinehart v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Richard S. Berry v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.