United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question of whether a sentencing judge, after announcing a rather long sentence, can refuse to permit a defendant to rebut factually the reasons stated orally by the judge for the sentence when defendant claims that the reasons are factually erroneous. Finding that the court below erred in refusing defendant this opportunity, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
Defendant-appellant, Elíseo Espinoza, Jr., was charged in a three count indictment along with two co-defendants, Gonzales and Robelin, for an offense involving the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Mayes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- United States v. Thomas C. TobiasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.