Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Fulwood

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 27, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-0862Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) ROY A. DANIEL, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-862 (RWR) ) ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiffs are federal inmates who alleged that the U.S. Parole Commission violated the Ex Post Facto Clause in making parole decisions by applying the 2000 parole guidelines rather than the 1972 parole regulations that were in place at the time each plaintiff was sentenced. The plaintiffs also alleged that they…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API