Shari Guertin v. Michigan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The court received petitions for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petitions for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petitions were fully considered upon the original submission and decision. The petitions then were circulated to the full court. 1 Less than a majority of the judges voted in favor of rehearing en banc.
Therefore, the petitions are denied.
CONCURRENCE
2Concurrence · GibbonsGibbons, Circuit Judge
I write separately to note that at this stage in the proceeding, it is better to find out what facts will eventually be before the district court, rather than to prematurely attempt to determine…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Sutton; Dissent.
3Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Carlo Vartinelli v. Aramark Correctional Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- J.W. v. The City of Jackson, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023
- Luke Waid v. Richard SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.