Copeland v. Dixie Const. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
With respect to the statutory right to amend a complaint “by striking out or adding new parties plaintiff, or by striking out or adding new parties defendant” (Code 1852, § 2403), it was held in Leaird v. Moore, 27 Ala. 326 (1855), that no amendment was authorized which worked a complete change of parties. The original statute has been amplified in some respects, but as to striking out or adding parties it has remained unchanged through successive codifications down to the present time. Code 1923, § 9513.
The original construction has been uniformly adhered to by this court, and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roth v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Leaird v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Steele v. BookerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Jones v. EngelhardtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Rarden Mercantile Co. v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Levy v. HLI Operating Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Ewart v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- McKelvey-coats Furniture Co. v. DoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Haines v. CunhaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.