Ewart v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The appeal is from a judgment upon executing a writ of inquiry before a jury upon judgment by default.
A former judgment was reversed, because the writ of inquiry was executed by the trial judge upon plaintiff’s attempted withdrawal of his demand for a jury without defendant’s consent. The order of this court was that such judgment “be reversed and the cause remanded for the execution of a proper writ of inquiry for the assessment of damages by a jury; the judgment by default being allowed to stand undisturbed.” Ewart-Brewer Motor Co. v. Cunningham, 213 Ala. 391, 104 So. 789. Under this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. CarlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- George's Restaurant v. DukesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Bozeman v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Attalla Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. GoddardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Copeland v. Dixie Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cabot v. Clearwater Construction CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Hughes v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Fortson v. HesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.