Legal Opinion

McKelvey-coats Furniture Co. v. Doe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1940No. 6 Div. 703PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

We have two statutes, new to the Code of 1923.

Section 5709, in the Chapter on Actions and Parties, reads: "Suing a party by a fictitious name, when allowed. — When the plaintiff is ignorant of the name of a defendant, he must state that fact in the complaint, and such defendant may be designated in any pleading or proceeding by any name, and when his true name is discovered, the pleading or proceeding must be amended accordingly.”

Section 9515, in the article on Amendment of Pleadings, reads: "Name of defendant. — When the plaintiff is ignorant of the name of the defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roth v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Rarden Mercantile Co. v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  3. Copeland v. Dixie Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Browning v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Minton v. WhisenantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Fowlkes v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Hinton v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Dannelley v. GuarinoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API