Legal Opinion

Haines v. Cunha

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 10, 1927No. 5 Div. 984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Suit by appellant against appellee, declaring on certain bank checks and on common counts for work and labor done. Defendant interposed pleas of res adjudicata, but plaintiff’s demurrer thereto was ■ sustained.

The cause was tried before the court without a -jury upon .pleas of general issue, payment, and set-off, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was sustained, the trial, court evidently being persuaded, as we gather from brief of counsel, that he had committed error in ruling against the pleas of res adjudicata, and this appeal is by the plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Terrell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Farley v. Alabama Terminal & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. McCall v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Plunkett v. DendySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Courtesy Ford Sales, Inc. v. FarriorCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  3. Maddox v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1941
  4. Water Works and Sewer Board of Fairhope v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Empire Land Co. v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API