Legal Opinion
Schell v. Southern California Edison Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1988No. E004131PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HEWS, J.
Plaintiff Wayne Schell appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to the sustaining of a general demurrer to his amended complaint without leave to amend.
Factual and Procedural History
Public Utilities Code section 7391 provides that the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) “shall designate a baseline quantity of gas and electricity which is necessary to supply a significant portion of the reasonable energy *1042needs of the average residential customer.” (§ 739, subd. (a).) The section also provides that the PUC require all gas and electric corporations to establish low…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Barnett v. Delta Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Vila v. Tahoe Southside Water UtilityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Cellular Plus, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Wise v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- People Ex Rel. Orloff v. Pacific BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Goncharov v. Uber Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.