Legal Opinion
Goncharov v. Uber Techs., Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 29, 2018No. A149347PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMargulies, J.
*1161Plaintiffs Leonid Goncharov, Mohammed Eddine, Alan Freberg, Trevor Johnson, Peter Kirby, and Jeremy Watt filed a putative class action lawsuit against Uber Technologies, Inc. (Uber) for providing unlicensed transportation services that appropriated passengers and income from licensed taxicab drivers. In the second amended complaint (SAC), plaintiffs alleged Uber failed to comply with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) licensing requirements for charter-party carriers. Uber filed a demurrer, claiming the court lacked jurisdiction under Public Utilities Code 1 section 1759 due to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Reynolds v. BementCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of S.F. v. Uber Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Bautzer v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Briley v. City of West CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Briley v. City of West CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.