Legal Opinion
Super Natural Distributors, Inc. v. Muscletech Research & Development
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 12, 2002No. 00-C-1361PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STADTMUELLER, Chief Judge.
Defendant MuscleTech Research and Development [“MuscleTech”] is a Canadian manufacturer of a popular line of dietary supplements. Plaintiff Super Natural Distributors, Inc. [“Super Natural”] is a national distributor of health products, including those of MuscleTech, whose physical plant is located in Waukesha, Wisconsin. This case arises out of Muscle-Tech’s termination of Super Natural’s distributorship after learning that Super Natural had obtained nearly $1 million worth of possibly counterfeit MuscleTech product from a mysterious off-shore supplier…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keith D. Schacht v. Wisconsin Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Ziegler Co., Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Rosemary Patterson v. Chicago Association for Retarded Citizens, an Illinois Not-For-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Home Protective Services, Inc. v. Adt Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Home Protective Services, Inc. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Brio Corp. v. Meccano S.N.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Home Protective Serv v. ADT Security Serv InCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006