Legal Opinion

Brio Corp. v. Meccano S.N.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 10, 2010No. Case 06-C-1001Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge.

This action arises out of defendant Meccano S.N.’s (“Meccano”) termination of its distribution agreement with plaintiff Brio Corporation (“Brio”). In May 2001, Brio and Meccano entered into a distribution agreement entitled “Distributor Agreement,” pursuant to which Meccano granted to Brio the exclusive right to sell Mecca-no’s Erector brand of toy within the United States. Meccano unilaterally terminated the agreement in September 2005, and the parties engaged in negotiations regarding the repurchase of Brio’s inventory of Meccano products.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Gates v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API