Legal Opinion

Clackamas County v. Dunham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 17, 1977No. 91323, CA 6817PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*597JOHNSON, J.

Defendants appeal the trial court decree declaring their mobile home a public nuisance and enjoining its use as a residence on defendants’ property. On October 1, 1972, defendants erected a "double wide” mobile home on their property which is designated as RR (Recreational Residential) by Clackamas County. The county zoning ordinance provides:

"22.3 Permitted Uses:
"In a recreational residential district, the following uses are allowed as hereinafter provided:
"A. Principal uses
"1. One single-family dwelling unit per lot or parcel of land.
"B. Conditional uses
"1. The following uses may…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Clackamas County v. AgueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Columbia County v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Yates v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PedenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Clackamas County v. DunhamOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Clackamas County v. DunhamOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Clackamas County v. DunhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API