Legal Opinion
Clackamas County v. Dunham
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 17, 1977No. 91323, CA 6817PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*597JOHNSON, J.
Defendants appeal the trial court decree declaring their mobile home a public nuisance and enjoining its use as a residence on defendants’ property. On October 1, 1972, defendants erected a "double wide” mobile home on their property which is designated as RR (Recreational Residential) by Clackamas County. The county zoning ordinance provides:
"22.3 Permitted Uses:
"In a recreational residential district, the following uses are allowed as hereinafter provided:
"A. Principal uses
"1. One single-family dwelling unit per lot or parcel of land.
"B. Conditional uses
"1. The following uses may…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Clackamas County v. AgueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Columbia County v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Yates v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. PedenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Clackamas County v. DunhamOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Clackamas County v. DunhamOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Clackamas County v. DunhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977