Legal Opinion

Clackamas County v. Dunham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1978No. TC 91323, CA 6817, SC 25644PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*421LENT, J.

This case involves the construction and application only of a Clackamas County Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance) as it pertains to defendants’ mobile home. In 1975, Clackamas County filed suit to enjoin defendants’ use of their mobile home as a residence and to abate such use as a public nuisance pursuant to ORS 215.180 (1975) and 215.185 (1975).1 The trial court found that defendants’ use of their mobile home as a residence violated the Ordinance, declared it a public nuisance and ordered it enjoined and permanently abated. The defendants appealed to the Court of Appeals, which, by a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Clackamas County v. AgueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Columbia County v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Clackamas County v. DunhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PedenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. HansomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. PEOPLES SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. Citicorp Acceptance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. General Electric Credit Corp. v. NordmarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Anderson v. PedenOregon Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API