Legal Opinion
Clackamas County v. Dunham
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1978No. TC 91323, CA 6817, SC 25644Published
1Opinion of the Court
579 P.2d 223 (1978)
282 Or. 419
CLACKAMAS COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon, Petitioner,
v.
William T. DUNHAM and Mary Lou Dunham, Husband and Wife, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.[*]
Argued and Submitted March 6, 1978.
Decided May 23, 1978.
Scott H. Parker, Clackamas County Counsel, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Mark P. O'Donnell, of O'Donnell, Rhoades & Gerber, Portland, argued the cause for respondents.
LENT, Justice.
This case involves the construction and application only of a Clackamas County Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance) as it…
Also in this document: Dissent · Howell; Dissent · Linde.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clackamas County v. AgueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Columbia County v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.