Legal Opinion
Wrightsman v. Stevenson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 13, 1934No. 23958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This action originated in, the district court of Tulsa county. It comes to this court on appeal. The plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the trial court, and the defendants in error were defendants therein. For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff, Edna Wrightsman, commenced this action on the 10th day of June, 1931, agaist the defendants R. Y. Stephenson, M. A. Snyder, and Carl Elmore (directors of water improvement district No. 8), the board of county' commissioners of Tulsa county, Okla., W. L. North, J. W. Dickery, Ed. W.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- City of Enid v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- City of Muskogee v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Board of County Com'rs v. Kiowa Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Paine v. City of GuymonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Martin v. Board of County Com'rs of Wagoner Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964