Legal Opinion

Weaver v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2003No. 20020312PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michael Paul Weaver appeals the trial court’s summary disposition of his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

[¶ 2] On July 27, 2000, Weaver was charged with contact by bodily fluids, a class C felony, for urinating on a law enforcement officer. The trial court appointed James Lester to defend Weaver. On January 10, 2001, a jury convicted Weaver of contact by bodily fluids. In State v. Weaver, 2002 ND 4, 638 N.W.2d 30, Weaver appealed the jury’s verdict and this Court affirmed. Weaver filed a post-conviction application based on several grounds. On February…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Steinbach v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mertz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bell v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vandeberg v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wong v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Parizek v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wheeler v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Flemming v. FlemmingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API