Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Joseph Thibodeaux

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1987No. 86-2399PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

Walter Joseph Thibodeaux directly appeals his sentence — the result of a hearing that did not fully comply with the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find that the noncompliance did not affect the appellant’s substantial rights and therefore affirm.

The appellant was indicted on two counts of a six-count indictment involving the unlawful dispensing of drugs by a licensed physician. He agreed to plead guilty to one count and to cooperate as a witness in exchange for the government’s promise to drop the other count and to recommend a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Eugene DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Oscar De Le PuenteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Noel Joseph BabineauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Jacobo GraibeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Gert Albertus TheronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Louis A. FerraraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Rafael Noriega-Milln, A/K/A RafiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Brian Douglas ZickertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API