Legal Opinion

United States v. Winston Eugene Dayton

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1979No. 78-5271PublishedCited by 223 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

The records reaching us for review in appeals after guilty pleas indicate that trial courts of this circuit are in doubt about the standards we apply in reviewing such matters. We took this case en banc to pass on its merits, of course, but also as a vehicle by which to review and harmonize our holdings on the subject. This opinion, the result of that review, is meant to be a clear and definitive statement of how trial courts should conduct guilty plea hearings and how we review those proceedings. As for their conduct, the governing principle can be simply stated: full…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by223 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. United States v. James BushertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. John O. Green A/K/A John O. HornungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API