Legal Opinion

State v. Hooper

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 24, 1985No. 83-1616PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

The state appeals an order dismissing its complaint in a forfeiture action brought under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, ch. 161, Stats. We reverse.

The state seeks forfeiture of $22,120.10 in currency, and $1,200 in checks payable to defendant Hooper. The currency and checks are alleged to be Hooper’s personal property and to have been derived from the crime of delivering cocaine. The action is brought pursuant to sec. 161.55(1) (f), Stats., which provides that “[a]ll property, real or personal, including money, directly or indirectly derived from or realized through the commission of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schlumpf v. YellickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. St. John Vianney School v. Board of Education of School District of JanesvilleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. State v. One 1973 CadillacCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Dungan v. County of PierceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. Lundquist v. McBethMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API