Legal Opinion

State v. One 1973 Cadillac

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 21, 1980No. 79-930, 79-931, 79-932, 79-999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDecker, C.J.

This case presents the question: can a forfeiture action under secs. 161.55(1) (d) and 161.555, Stats., 1 be brought against an automobile as the sole “defendant” ? We hold that it cannot.

In each of the four cases consolidated on appeal, the state seized a vehicle in connection with a drug arrest. Forfeiture actions naming the vehicle as the sole defendant 2 were commenced by filing a summons, complaint, and affidavit with the clerk of court and by personally serving such papers upon the persons from whom the vehicles were seized, who were also the apparent owners of the vehicles. All four…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meinshausen v. A. Gettelman Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. I, a WOMAN-PART IIWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Baker v. TormeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tews v. NHI, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Groom v. Professionals Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  4. Estate of Hegarty Ex Rel. Hegarty v. BeauchaineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API