Legal Opinion
Lundquist v. McBeth
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 2001No. 01-218PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
¶1 Plaintiffs, Jay E. Lundquist and Donna M. Lundquist, attempted to file a pro se complaint against Defendant, Michael W. McBeth, in the District Court for the Third Judicial District in Granite County to void an allegedly fraudulent conveyance of real estate. The District Court ordered the complaint withdrawn pursuant to Rules 11 and 15(a), M.R.Civ.P. Subsequently, Lundquists filed what they deemed to be an amended complaint. McBeth filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint as untimely, pursuant to the statute of limitations for fraudulent transfers. Further, McBeth requested that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Hollister v. ForsytheMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Omark-Prentice Hydraulics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Shull v. First Interstate BankMontana Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byrum v. AndrenMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Gadbaw v. Montana Eighth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Montana Interventional & Diagnostic Radiology Specialists, PLLC v. St. Peter's HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Gasvoda v. Ravalli CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Kasben v. YardleyMontana Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.