Legal Opinion

Capitol Surgical Supplies, Inc. v. Casale

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 28, 2004No. 02-4144UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge.

Capitol Surgical Supplies d/b/a Capitol Marketing Group (“Capitol”) appeals from the District Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Michael J. Casale, Jr., Esquire, and the law firm with which he is associated, Ca-sale & Bonner, P.C. (collectively, “Ca-sale”). Capitol’s claims involve the alleged legal malpractice and related breach of contract by Casale. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.

The background is set forth at length in the District Court’s order. Thus, because we write for the parties,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curley v. KlemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Reitz v. County of BucksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Atkinson v. HaugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Cost v. CostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Browne v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  2. Lefta Associates v. HurleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. David Cutler Industries, Ltd. v. Direct Group, Inc. (In Re David Cutler Industries, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Farr v. Northrup QuarryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Newman Grill Systems, LLC v. Ducane Gas Grills, Inc. (In Re Ducane Gas Grills, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API