Legal Opinion

Morse v. Metropolitan Steamship Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 13, 1917PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On bill, &e.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Y. C.

(orally).

1 announced yesterday that I would appoint a receiver at once, owing to what I consider to be the exigencies of the occasion. It is now stated that appeal will be taken to the court of errors and appeals, and, as there may be a necessity for an early application to thát court for ad interim relief, I will announce my conclusions on the law at this time. Counsel for the defendant corporation has made application for a stay of the operation of the order or interlocutory decree and the application has been argued as if the order had actually been signed. I am going to. deny…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Du Puy v. Transportation & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Bostock v. High Tech Elevator Ind.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Freidus v. KaufmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Hollander v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API