Morse v. Metropolitan Steamship Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill, &e.
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, Y. C.
(orally).
1 announced yesterday that I would appoint a receiver at once, owing to what I consider to be the exigencies of the occasion. It is now stated that appeal will be taken to the court of errors and appeals, and, as there may be a necessity for an early application to thát court for ad interim relief, I will announce my conclusions on the law at this time. Counsel for the defendant corporation has made application for a stay of the operation of the order or interlocutory decree and the application has been argued as if the order had actually been signed. I am going to. deny…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Du Puy v. Transportation & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
3Cited by13 opinions
- McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Bostock v. High Tech Elevator Ind.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Freidus v. KaufmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Hollander v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.