Legal Opinion

Bostock v. High Tech Elevator Ind.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 25, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

260 N.J. Super. 432 (1992)

616 A.2d 1314

PETER G. BOSTOCK, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

HIGH TECH ELEVATOR INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY BUSINESS CORPORATION, AND KENNETH R. RICE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS AN OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF HIGH TECH ELEVATOR INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 27, 1992.

Decided November 25, 1992.

Before Judges MICHELS and BAIME.

Jon C. Martin argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, attorneys; Jonathan D. Weiner, of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. State v. PonterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. Skripek v. BergamoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Orchard v. CovelliDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brenner v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Cabakov v. ThatcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Walensky v. Jonathan Royce Intern.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Muellenberg v. Bikon Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Grato v. GratoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API