Legal Opinion

Naltner v. Dolan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1886No. 12,371PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Naltner, on the 24th day of February, 1883, commenced proceedings in attachment against Dolan, and on the same day caused a summons in garnishment to be served on the appellants herein. On the 7th day of March following, upon his intervening petition, Montague was admitted as a party to the proceeding. He filed a cross complaint, in which he alleged, in substance, that the fund in the hands of the appellants—that being the subject of the attachment and garnishee proceedings—had been assigned to him by Dolan, for a valuable consideration, before the proceedings wore commenced. He prayed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bundy v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McLain v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. School District v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Williams v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Utica Insurance v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1845

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HopleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Pethybridge v. First State Bk. of LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Vigo Township v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Summit Airlines, Inc. v. Ganz (In Re Summit Airlines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API