Elizalde v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, denying a new trial. S. E. Crow, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action against the sureties on an administrator’s bond, by his successor in office, to recover the balance found upon an accounting to be due from said administrator to the estate of the deceased. Plaintiff, being dissatisfied with the amount of the judgment in favor of the estate, appeals from an order of the superior court denying her motion for a new trial. This is the second appeal taken by plaintiff based upon the alleged improper allowance by the trial court of items of credit on behalf of defendants.
On the former appeal (4 Cal. App. 117, [87 Pac. 245]), the judgment of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Wallace v. SissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Estate of ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Cramer v. BiddisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Nye v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
- Estate of SidebothamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.