Legal Opinion

Lee v. DeBERRY

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1951No. 16510PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FishburnE, Justice:

The issue in this case was brought before the court of common pleas for Florence County pursuant to the provisions of Sections 361-368 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 62-64, 7 U. S. C. A. §§ 1361-1368. The case is one of novel impression in this court, and, under the Federal Act referred to, relates to the tobacco acreage allotment for tobacco growers'.

The controversy arises out of the fact that the plaintiff, S. F. Lee, who will hereafter be referred to as respondent, had for a number of years prior to 1949, been engaged in farming in Florence County…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Board of Bank Control v. ThomasonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Luke v. Review CommitteeDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1957
  3. MacE v. BERRYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  4. Review Committee, Venue VII, Commodity Stabilization Service, United States Department of Agriculture v. WilleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  5. Lautares v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API