Legal Opinion
MacE v. BERRY
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 1, 1954No. 16854PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moss, Acting Associate Justice.
This action was instituted by the appellant to review the 1951 flue-cured tobacco acreage allotment and farm marketing quota for the appellant’s farm, under the Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 52 Stat. 31, 62 Stat. 1250, 7 U. S. C. § 1281 et seq., 7 U. S. C. A. § 1281 et seq. The Act authorizes such review in the United States District Court, for the district in which the farm is located, or by a proceeding “in any court of record of the State having general jurisdiction, sitting in the county * * * in which his [the plaintiff’s] farm is located…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ScarlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lee v. BERRYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Lee v. DeBERRYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- W. A. McClung v. W. C. Thompson, W. C. Thompson v. W. A. McClungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Balkcom v. CrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Johnson v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Williamson v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.