Legal Opinion

Getty v. City of Syracuse

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1929No. 28,772PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiffs, property owners in the city of Syracuse, commenced this action against the city and its officers to enjoin them from issuing bonds or other obligations of the city to pay for the pavement of streets and intersections of streets in the city, and from paying out of the funds of the city any sum whatever on account of grading and paving that had been done, and from levying taxes to pay bonds that might be issued to pay for the paving. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs as asked in their petition. The defendants…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hines v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  2. Brown v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Sullivan v. School District No. 39Supreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. John Ritchie & Sons v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. Common School District No. 87Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Cowart v. Union Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Beeler & Campbell Supply Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Schenk v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Columbian Title & Trust Co. v. City of TribuneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API