Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Atchison

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error from Atohison District Court. This was an action brought in the district court of Atchison county on March 26,1883, by the city of Atchison against William Hetherington and Webster W. Hetherington, partners as Wm. Hetherington & Co., to have certain bonds of the city of Atchison, twenty in number and each for $500, amounting in the aggregate to $10,000, canceled and declared null and void for illegality in their execution, and for want of consideration.

Read the full summary

Error from Atohison District Court. This was an action brought in the district court of Atchison county on March 26,1883, by the city of Atchison against William Hetherington and Webster W. Hetherington, partners as Wm. Hetherington & Co., to have certain bonds of the city of Atchison, twenty in number and each for $500, amounting in the aggregate to $10,000, canceled and declared null and void for illegality in their execution, and for want of consideration. On December 12,1883, the defendants answered, setting forth the circumstances under which the bonds were placed in their hands, that…

1Opinion of the Court

*43The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

On August 23,1879, Brown & Bier owned bonds of the city of Atchison, which was then a city of the second class, amounting in the aggregate, principal and interest, to the sum of $49,943.95, which by an agreement with the city were re-funded at the rate of sixty cents on the dollar, Brown & Bier receiving in new or re-funding bonds $29,950, and in money $16.37. Also, as a part of the same transaction, other new or re-funding bonds to the amount of $10,000 were issued by the city of Atchison and deposited with Wm. Hetherington & Co. as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Contra Costa Water Co. v. BreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Jay v. School District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. County of CitrusSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. County of Sacramento v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Williams v. City of EmmettIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API