Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. School District No. 39

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from, Brown District Court. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment for defendants, at the May term, 1886. The plaintiffs, T. F. Sullivan ■& Co., bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought in the district •court of Brown county by Theodrick F. Sullivan and George W. Henry, partners as T. F. Sullivan & Co., against Hiram Eley, School District No. 39, Brown county, Henry Monroe, Mary Jane Monroe, Richard F: Shubert, William Shubert, and Herman Shubert, "to recover a personal judgment against Eley for $469.35, and to foreclose a mechanics’ lien upon certain real estate belonging to the school district. It was alleged in the plaintiffs’ petition, and admitted in the school district’s answer, that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cook v. TullisSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Sherman v. FitchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Read v. PlattsmouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Pinches v. Swedish Evangelical Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  5. City of Conyers v. Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State ex rel. Miller v. Common School District No. 87Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Loomis v. Fifth School DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Doyle v. School Dist. No. 38, Noble CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Parrick v. School District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API