Legal Opinion

Robert A. Athey v. the United States 9

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 30, 2013No. Case Number 99-2051CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

5 U.S.C. § 5596, The Back Pay Act; 5 U.S.C. §§ 5551-5552, lump-sum payment statutes; RCFC 12(b)(1), RCFC 12(b)(6); Wallace v. Office of Personnel Management, 283 F.3d 1360 (Fed.Cir.2002); Muniz v. United States, 972 F.2d 1304 (Fed.Cir.1992)

OPINION AND ORDER

SMITH, Senior Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs, former employees of the Department of Veterans…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Athey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Gerald K. Kandel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Gerald K. Kandel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API