Legal Opinion

Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1986No. 588PA85PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

This appeal involves an action brought by the plaintiff Lea Company under N.C.G.S. § 136-111 for inverse condemnation. The primary issue raised before this Court involves the constitutionality of the statutory interest rate as applied to the facts of this case. The trial court held that it would be unconstitutional to apply the statutory rate of 8% per annum in calculating the additional compensation owed the plaintiff by reason of the defendant’s delay in payment from the date of the taking to the date of judgment awarding compensation. We agree.

The plaintiff alleged that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Phelps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crist v. MoffattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Lea Company v. Narth Carolina Bd. of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Belk ex rel. Belk v. BelkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Concrete MacHinery Co. v. City of HickoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API