Legal Opinion

Vicinanzo Ex Rel. Vicinanzo v. Brunschwig & Fils, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 14, 1990No. 88 Civ. 7975 (CLB)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIEANT, Chief Judge.

On October 30, 1983, Joan Short Vicinan-zo, an employee of defendant Brunschwig & Fils, Inc. (B & F), was seriously injured in an off-duty automobile accident. For more than seven years, she was a valued employee and wallpaper designer. Now, nearly seven years later, she is completely, but perhaps not permanently disabled, and requires round-the-clock medical care at a cost of approximately $300,000 per year.

This lawsuit involves her continuing rights, if any, under an employee benefit plan sponsored by B & F and issued by New England Mutual Life…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Cheryl R. Zimmerman v. Sloss Equipment, Inc., S & N Enterprises, Inc., Richard SlossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Weems v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Dawes v. First Unum Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  4. McDonald v. Artcraft Electric Supply Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Midland Steel Products Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API