Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Artcraft Electric Supply Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 9, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-3051PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FLANNERY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

In March of 1989, Defendant Artcraft Electrical Supply (“Artcraft”) hired Plaintiff Douglas McDonald (“McDonald”) as a sales representative. One year later, in March of 1990, Artcraft terminated McDonald’s employment. Plaintiffs allege, and Defendants do not dispute, that while McDonald was employed by Artcraft, his compensation included enrollment in the Consolidated Electric Supply Employee Group Medical Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan, which is self-insured, is funded, operated and administered by Defendant Wilcox and Gibbs. All Parties…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Weems v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Vaughn v. Owen Steel Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1994
  3. Sullivan v. LTV Aerospace and Defense Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1994
  4. Hulcher v. United Behavioral Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  5. Pegg v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API