Legal Opinion
Cheryl R. Zimmerman v. Sloss Equipment, Inc., S & N Enterprises, Inc., Richard Sloss
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1995No. 93-3386PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Cheryl Zimmerman brought this action for damages under section 510 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1140, alleging that defendants discriminated against her and discharged her to avoid paying for her medical benefits. In a pretrial ruling, the district court denied her request for a jury trial and held that she was not entitled to extra-contractual damages. Zimmerman v. Sloss Equipment, Inc., 835 F.Supp. 1283 (D.Kan.1993). Following a trial to the bench, the court denied Ms. Zimmerman relief, finding that she had not been discharged and that she lacked health insurance due to her…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Michael Nero v. Industrial Molding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Gregory C. Mallett v. Wisconsin Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and Judy R. Norman-NunneryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Sanchez v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Millsap v. McDonell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Adams v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.