Legal Opinion
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Midland Steel Products Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 14, 1991No. 1:89CV02138PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
KRENZLER, District Judge.
The United Auto Workers Local No. 486 and several named individuals (“plaintiffs”), now certified as a class, filed suit against Midland Steel Products Co. and the Lamson & Sessions Co. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Midland”), in November, 1989 alleging that Midland discharged approximately 290 union employees for the purpose of interfering with the attainment of certain medical and life insurance benefits. Plaintiffs brought this action under the Employee Retirement…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cheryl R. Zimmerman v. Sloss Equipment, Inc., S & N Enterprises, Inc., Richard SlossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Weems v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Torre v. Federated Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Zimmerman v. Sloss Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Hulcher v. United Behavioral Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.