Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Kautz
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1975No. 11823PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*432STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
In this special action, petitioner seeks to compel the Honorable Harold L. Kautz, Judge of the City Court of the City of Phoenix, to grant him a trial by jury on the charge of simple assault and battery. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to the Constitution of Arizona, Article 6, § 5, A. R.S., and Rule 2 of Special Actions, Rules of Procedure, 17A A.R.S. After further consideration, we have concluded that the petition should be. ordered dismissed and it is so ordered.
Petitioner was charged in the City Court of the City .of Phoenix with willfully and unlawfully…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stockwell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. MaierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Lapp v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Bruce v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BennionIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. DolnyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.