Legal Opinion

Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 20, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 01-0144PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (the “State”) charged Ravi R. Urs with one count of reckless driving, a class 2 misdemeanor, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 28-693 (Supp.2000), for driving his vehicle on a closed portion of freeway. The justice court subsequently denied Urs’ request for a jury trial, and he sought special action relief from the superior court. That court granted relief to Urs and instructed the justice court to provide him with a jury trial. The justice court then stayed its proceedings pending our resolution of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ColtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Brown v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. McDougall v. StrohsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. O'BRIENHawaii Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Stoudamire v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. David G. v. Pollard Ex Rel. County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  4. James LeBlanc, Christine LeBlanc Fortin, David LeBlanc and Herman LeBlanc v. Robert E. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. State v. Le NobleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API