Legal Opinion

Easom v. General Mortgage Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1929No. Docket No. 6944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by plaintiff (respondent herein), as the assignee of one James H. Hardy, to secure a balance due upon the purchase price of certain promissory notes which the General Mortgage Company, defendant below and appellant herein, had purchased under contract from the said Hardy. The answer of the Mortgage Company purported to deny the performance of conditions precedent, and as a separate defense set up certain small counterclaims. There was also included in the answer a cross-complaint alleging fraud and praying for a rescission of the original contract.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. UrquidasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Lowe v. San Francisco & Northwestern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co. v. Abner Doble Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marlenee v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ritchie v. Long Beach Community Hospital Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Huston v. SchohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Harvey v. DegarmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Kabran v. Sharp MemorialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API